Showing posts tagged as "NATO"

Showing posts tagged NATO

26 Oct
All change | The Economist
Some confidence in the security transition, and a belief that Western governments will not abandon Afghanistan after 2014, is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for a more or less successful political transition. Foreigners can help, but most of the responsibility lies with Afghans. A report published this month by the International Crisis Group, a Brussels-based NGO, described the road to the 2014 elections as long and hard. “In the current environment”, the report said, “prospects for clean elections and a smooth transition are slim. The electoral process is mired in bureaucratic confusion, institutional duplication and political machinations…There are alarming signs Karzai hopes to stack the deck for a favoured proxy.”
FULL ARTICLE (The Economist)
Photo: ISAF Media/Flickr

All change | The Economist

Some confidence in the security transition, and a belief that Western governments will not abandon Afghanistan after 2014, is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for a more or less successful political transition. Foreigners can help, but most of the responsibility lies with Afghans. A report published this month by the International Crisis Group, a Brussels-based NGO, described the road to the 2014 elections as long and hard. “In the current environment”, the report said, “prospects for clean elections and a smooth transition are slim. The electoral process is mired in bureaucratic confusion, institutional duplication and political machinations…There are alarming signs Karzai hopes to stack the deck for a favoured proxy.”

FULL ARTICLE (The Economist)

Photo: ISAF Media/Flickr

21 Oct
NATO chief calls for free elections in Afghanistan | Reuters Africa
By Adrian Croft
MAZAR-E SHARIF, Afghanistan (Reuters) - NATO’s chief Anders Fogh Rasmussen urged the Afghan government on Friday to strive for free, fair and transparent elections in the 2014 presidential poll, saying they marked a critical juncture in the country’s quest for peace.
His words came a day after President Hamid Karzai suggested foreign members be removed from the election watchdog, in a step that could be seen as bolstering his grip on power.
“I think it is essential for building trust and confidence between the Afghan people and the Afghan government that the presidential elections take place in a manner that is free, fair and transparent,” Rasmussen said in an interview with Reuters on the airstrip at Camp Marmal, a sprawling military base near Mazar-e-Sharif in northern Afghanistan.
FULL ARTICLE (Reuters Africa)
Photo: payorivero/Flickr

NATO chief calls for free elections in Afghanistan | Reuters Africa

By Adrian Croft

MAZAR-E SHARIF, Afghanistan (Reuters) - NATO’s chief Anders Fogh Rasmussen urged the Afghan government on Friday to strive for free, fair and transparent elections in the 2014 presidential poll, saying they marked a critical juncture in the country’s quest for peace.

His words came a day after President Hamid Karzai suggested foreign members be removed from the election watchdog, in a step that could be seen as bolstering his grip on power.

“I think it is essential for building trust and confidence between the Afghan people and the Afghan government that the presidential elections take place in a manner that is free, fair and transparent,” Rasmussen said in an interview with Reuters on the airstrip at Camp Marmal, a sprawling military base near Mazar-e-Sharif in northern Afghanistan.

FULL ARTICLE (Reuters Africa)

Photo: payorivero/Flickr

15 Oct
Afghan government could ‘collapse post-NATO’ | Al Jazeera
The Afghan government could implode after NATO troops pull out in 2014, particularly if presidential elections are fraudulent, according to a report by the International Crisis Group (ICG).
A repeat could undermine what little hope remains for stability after the Afghan government takes full responsibility for security from US-led NATO forces, the analysis by the respected Brussels-based group says.
The report, Afghanistan: The Long, Hard Road to the 2014 Transition, says the country is on course in 2014 for another set of fraudulent elections after the chaotic presidential and parliamentary polls in 2009 and 2010.
“There is a real risk that the regime in Kabul could collapse upon NATO’s withdrawal,” Candace Rondeaux, the ICG’s senior Afghanistan analyst, says in the report.
FULL ARTICLE (Al Jazeera)
Photo: The U.S. Army/Flickr

Afghan government could ‘collapse post-NATO’ | Al Jazeera

The Afghan government could implode after NATO troops pull out in 2014, particularly if presidential elections are fraudulent, according to a report by the International Crisis Group (ICG).

A repeat could undermine what little hope remains for stability after the Afghan government takes full responsibility for security from US-led NATO forces, the analysis by the respected Brussels-based group says.

The report, Afghanistan: The Long, Hard Road to the 2014 Transition, says the country is on course in 2014 for another set of fraudulent elections after the chaotic presidential and parliamentary polls in 2009 and 2010.

“There is a real risk that the regime in Kabul could collapse upon NATO’s withdrawal,” Candace Rondeaux, the ICG’s senior Afghanistan analyst, says in the report.

FULL ARTICLE (Al Jazeera)

Photo: The U.S. Army/Flickr

14 Oct
Afghanistan facing humanitarian crisis, warns Red Cross head | The Telegraph
By Ben Farmer
Reto Stocker said he was “filled with concern” as he prepared to leave after seven years and hope for the future among Afghans had been “steadily declining”.
The assessment from one of the largest humanitarian charities in Afghanistan sharply contradicts Nato claims of progress in the 11-year-long campaign to defeat the Taliban and rebuild the country.
But his remarks followed a recent rash of similarly bleak forecasts for Afghanistan’s future as Nato troops withdraw and prepare to hand over security duties to Kabul by the end of 2014.
FULL ARTCLE (The Telegraph)
Photo: DVIDSHUB/Flickr

Afghanistan facing humanitarian crisis, warns Red Cross head | The Telegraph

By Ben Farmer

Reto Stocker said he was “filled with concern” as he prepared to leave after seven years and hope for the future among Afghans had been “steadily declining”.

The assessment from one of the largest humanitarian charities in Afghanistan sharply contradicts Nato claims of progress in the 11-year-long campaign to defeat the Taliban and rebuild the country.

But his remarks followed a recent rash of similarly bleak forecasts for Afghanistan’s future as Nato troops withdraw and prepare to hand over security duties to Kabul by the end of 2014.

FULL ARTCLE (The Telegraph)

Photo: DVIDSHUB/Flickr

9 Oct
Afghanistan’s Transition Meltdown
Kabul/Brussels  |   8 Oct 2012
Afghanistan is hurtling toward a devastating political crisis as the government prepares to take full control of security in 2014.
“There is a real risk that the regime in Kabul could collapse upon NATO’s withdrawal in 2014”, says Candace Rondeaux, the International Crisis Group’s Senior Afghanistan Analyst. “The window for remedial action is closing fast”.
Afghanistan: The Long, Hard Road to the 2014 Transition, Crisis Group’s new report, explains how the country is on course for another set of fraudulent elections and how that could  undermine what little hope remains for stability after it takes full responsibility for security.
“The Afghan army and police are overwhelmed and underprepared for the transition”, says Rondeaux. “Another botched election and resultant unrest would push them to breaking point”.
The new report details the challenge ahead as the country’s political leaders prepare for political and security transition in eighteen months. The government’s credibility has not recovered since the fraudulent and chaotic presidential and parliamentary polls in 2009 and 2010, and so far, leaders have been unable to reverse the downward spiral.
“President Karzai and parliament have long known what needs to be done to ensure a clean vote, but they have steadfastly refused to take any serious steps in that direction”, says Rondeaux. “Karzai seems more interested in perpetuating his own power by any means rather than ensuring credibility of the political system and long-term stability in the country”.
Resolving both the long crisis over electoral administration and related constitutional disputes could well be the key to determining whether the current political system will survive the NATO drawdown. If the elections are again nothing but fraud, the credibility of the authorities will be cast into even deeper doubt, and more people will look to alternatives.
Many key tasks are unfinished, particularly regarding electoral oversight. Confusion over the rival authority of several commissions and the courts threatens to unravel the system entirely. Constitutional defects need to be addressed, and rule of law has to be reinforced as the transition unfolds. As the first step, the date for presidential elections should be set as soon as possible.
Unfortunately, it is not likely many in the political elite view the problem this way. The danger is that President Karzai’s top priority is maintaining control, either directly or via a trusted proxy. He and other leading members of the elite may be able to cobble together a broad temporary alliance, but political competition is likely to turn violent on the heels of NATO’s withdrawal.
The possibility cannot be excluded that he will declare a state of emergency as a means of extending his power. Such a move would accelerate state collapse and likely precipitate the next civil war in the country. If that occurs, there would be few opportunities to reverse course in the near term. Securing the peace in Afghanistan would then remain at best a very distant hope.
FULL REPORT

Afghanistan’s Transition Meltdown

Kabul/Brussels  |   8 Oct 2012

Afghanistan is hurtling toward a devastating political crisis as the government prepares to take full control of security in 2014.

“There is a real risk that the regime in Kabul could collapse upon NATO’s withdrawal in 2014”, says Candace Rondeaux, the International Crisis Group’s Senior Afghanistan Analyst. “The window for remedial action is closing fast”.

Afghanistan: The Long, Hard Road to the 2014 Transition, Crisis Group’s new report, explains how the country is on course for another set of fraudulent elections and how that could  undermine what little hope remains for stability after it takes full responsibility for security.

“The Afghan army and police are overwhelmed and underprepared for the transition”, says Rondeaux. “Another botched election and resultant unrest would push them to breaking point”.

The new report details the challenge ahead as the country’s political leaders prepare for political and security transition in eighteen months. The government’s credibility has not recovered since the fraudulent and chaotic presidential and parliamentary polls in 2009 and 2010, and so far, leaders have been unable to reverse the downward spiral.

“President Karzai and parliament have long known what needs to be done to ensure a clean vote, but they have steadfastly refused to take any serious steps in that direction”, says Rondeaux. “Karzai seems more interested in perpetuating his own power by any means rather than ensuring credibility of the political system and long-term stability in the country”.

Resolving both the long crisis over electoral administration and related constitutional disputes could well be the key to determining whether the current political system will survive the NATO drawdown. If the elections are again nothing but fraud, the credibility of the authorities will be cast into even deeper doubt, and more people will look to alternatives.

Many key tasks are unfinished, particularly regarding electoral oversight. Confusion over the rival authority of several commissions and the courts threatens to unravel the system entirely. Constitutional defects need to be addressed, and rule of law has to be reinforced as the transition unfolds. As the first step, the date for presidential elections should be set as soon as possible.

Unfortunately, it is not likely many in the political elite view the problem this way. The danger is that President Karzai’s top priority is maintaining control, either directly or via a trusted proxy. He and other leading members of the elite may be able to cobble together a broad temporary alliance, but political competition is likely to turn violent on the heels of NATO’s withdrawal.

The possibility cannot be excluded that he will declare a state of emergency as a means of extending his power. Such a move would accelerate state collapse and likely precipitate the next civil war in the country. If that occurs, there would be few opportunities to reverse course in the near term. Securing the peace in Afghanistan would then remain at best a very distant hope.

FULL REPORT

2 Oct
Insider attacks threaten NATO mission in Afghanistan | Deutsche Welle
By Spencer Kimball
A spike in insider attacks on NATO troops by Afghan soldiers and police has threatened to undermine trust between the comrades-in-arms. NATO has begun to resume work with Afghan units after suspending joint patrols.
After a decade of war and just two years before NATO’s 2014 withdrawal deadline, the US-led military coalition and Afghan forces are struggling to maintain confidence in each other amid a rise in insider attacks. NATO has begun to slowly lift a week-long suspension of joint patrols with Afghan security forces, which had been imposed as a consequence of the “green-on-blue” attacks.
FULL ARTICLE (Deutsche Welle)
Photo: The U.S. Army/Flickr

Insider attacks threaten NATO mission in Afghanistan | Deutsche Welle

By Spencer Kimball

A spike in insider attacks on NATO troops by Afghan soldiers and police has threatened to undermine trust between the comrades-in-arms. NATO has begun to resume work with Afghan units after suspending joint patrols.

After a decade of war and just two years before NATO’s 2014 withdrawal deadline, the US-led military coalition and Afghan forces are struggling to maintain confidence in each other amid a rise in insider attacks. NATO has begun to slowly lift a week-long suspension of joint patrols with Afghan security forces, which had been imposed as a consequence of the “green-on-blue” attacks.

FULL ARTICLE (Deutsche Welle)

Photo: The U.S. Army/Flickr

27 Sep
Afghanistan exit strategy in doubt as Isaf command bans joint operations | The Guardian 
By Emma Graham-Harrison in Kabul, Julian Borger and Richard Norton-Taylor
Nato’s exit strategy in Afghanistan appeared to be in serious jeopardy on Tuesday, after it emerged that the US military command had set fresh limits on joint operations with Afghan troops in the wake of a rapid increase of “green-on-blue attacks” involving local soldiers turning their guns on their foreign mentors.
The order, issued by the deputy commander of the Nato-led International Security Assistance Force (Isaf), Lieutenant General James Terry, indefinitely suspends joint patrols and other operations for units smaller than 800-strong battalions.
FULL ARTICLE (The Guardian)
Photo: U.S. Army/Flickr

Afghanistan exit strategy in doubt as Isaf command bans joint operations | The Guardian 

By Emma Graham-Harrison in Kabul, Julian Borger and Richard Norton-Taylor

Nato’s exit strategy in Afghanistan appeared to be in serious jeopardy on Tuesday, after it emerged that the US military command had set fresh limits on joint operations with Afghan troops in the wake of a rapid increase of “green-on-blue attacks” involving local soldiers turning their guns on their foreign mentors.

The order, issued by the deputy commander of the Nato-led International Security Assistance Force (Isaf), Lieutenant General James Terry, indefinitely suspends joint patrols and other operations for units smaller than 800-strong battalions.

FULL ARTICLE (The Guardian)

Photo: U.S. Army/Flickr

19 Sep
"Security assistance is the number one pillar of the US strategy in Afghanistan. Everything centers around training and equipping Afghan forces so that US and NATO can finally exit [in 2014] after 14 years at war. The fact that you have seen such a dramatic shift and such a huge widening of the trust deficit between Afghan forces and their foreign advisers really indicates that the strategy is in serious peril."

—Candace Rondeaux, Crisis Group’s senior analyst for Afghanistan, on “green-on-blue” killings, in “Joint raids suspended: NATO’s Afghanistan strategy hits hurdle”, Christian Science Monitor

6 Jul
Brussels is focusing on Georgia’s internal politics | Democracy and Freedom Watch
Interview of Alain Deletroz by M. Gagua and L. Tughushi
“The only thing I can say is that whenever you have an electoral process it brings up the tension in the country. I think it is normal whenever you have presidential elections. The main political parties have to take positions on a variety of issues, and sometimes they take positions, which go over or a bit further than the position they will actually represent once they are in government. So I think in Georgia you are already feeling this pressure boiling.”
Full Q & A (Democracy and Freedom Watch)
Photo: Admin

Brussels is focusing on Georgia’s internal politics | Democracy and Freedom Watch

Interview of Alain Deletroz by M. Gagua and L. Tughushi

The only thing I can say is that whenever you have an electoral process it brings up the tension in the country. I think it is normal whenever you have presidential elections. The main political parties have to take positions on a variety of issues, and sometimes they take positions, which go over or a bit further than the position they will actually represent once they are in government. So I think in Georgia you are already feeling this pressure boiling.”

Full Q & A (Democracy and Freedom Watch)

Photo: Admin

27 Jun
Comment | For justice and civilians, don’t rule out regime change | The Globe and Mail
By LOUISE ARBOUR
Civilian casualties in Syria shock our consciences, but there is also a frustrating acknowledgment that military intervention there might do more harm than good. The best option to protect Syrians is peace; ending the conflict should also end the massacres. But is the reverse true? Would an initiative aimed solely at protecting civilians resolve the conflict? Not necessarily.
Responsibility to protect – the emerging principle that states can intervene in other states to prevent mass atrocities, invoked in the case of Libya – suffers from the same uncomfortable relationship with peace that justice does. In both cases, the desired objective – protecting civilians or bringing criminals to justice – falls short of, or is often even at odds with, the objective of peace. Humanitarian or judicial objectives address only the manner in which the conflict unfolds, not its ultimate resolution.
In Libya, this dilemma was resolved by merging the three objectives. First, justice: The United Nations Security Council referred the matter to the International Criminal Court. Second, civilians: It authorized “all necessary measures” to protect them. Third, presumably hoping to achieve the first two objectives, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization undertook to bring an end to the conflict by effecting (or supporting, depending on your perspective) regime change.
But the manner in which this happened, with NATO widely thought to have overinterpreted its mandate, exposes weaknesses in the current approach. Under both international criminal justice and R2P, the interventionist role of the international community is predicated on the fact that the state in crisis, which has the primary responsibility for protecting its people and dispensing justice, is “unwilling or unable” to do so.
FULL ARTICLE (The Globe and Mail)
Photo: Denis Balibouse/Reuters

Comment | For justice and civilians, don’t rule out regime change | The Globe and Mail

By LOUISE ARBOUR

Civilian casualties in Syria shock our consciences, but there is also a frustrating acknowledgment that military intervention there might do more harm than good. The best option to protect Syrians is peace; ending the conflict should also end the massacres. But is the reverse true? Would an initiative aimed solely at protecting civilians resolve the conflict? Not necessarily.

Responsibility to protect – the emerging principle that states can intervene in other states to prevent mass atrocities, invoked in the case of Libya – suffers from the same uncomfortable relationship with peace that justice does. In both cases, the desired objective – protecting civilians or bringing criminals to justice – falls short of, or is often even at odds with, the objective of peace. Humanitarian or judicial objectives address only the manner in which the conflict unfolds, not its ultimate resolution.

In Libya, this dilemma was resolved by merging the three objectives. First, justice: The United Nations Security Council referred the matter to the International Criminal Court. Second, civilians: It authorized “all necessary measures” to protect them. Third, presumably hoping to achieve the first two objectives, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization undertook to bring an end to the conflict by effecting (or supporting, depending on your perspective) regime change.

But the manner in which this happened, with NATO widely thought to have overinterpreted its mandate, exposes weaknesses in the current approach. Under both international criminal justice and R2P, the interventionist role of the international community is predicated on the fact that the state in crisis, which has the primary responsibility for protecting its people and dispensing justice, is “unwilling or unable” to do so.

FULL ARTICLE (The Globe and Mail)

Photo: Denis Balibouse/Reuters